Instituto Nacional de Salud de los Trabajadores. Departamento de Psicofisiología. La Habana, Cuba
Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso. Depatamento de Imagenología. La Habana, Cuba
Instituto Nacional de Salud de los Trabajadores. Departamento de Psicofisiología. La Habana, Cuba
Instituto Nacional de Salud de los Trabajadores. Departamento de Psicofisiología. La Habana, Cuba
Ministerio de Salud Pública. Departamento de Investigaciones. La Habana, Cuba
Instituto Nacional de Salud de los Trabajadores. Departamento de Psicofisiología. La Habana, Cuba
Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatrography is the therapeutic method of choice to treat biliopancreatic diseases. The complexity of the endoscopic procedure, learning curves, duration, and the demand for the service in health institutions, condition the presence of ergonomic risks in the domain of the multidisciplinary team that intervenes in the technique.
Objective: To describe about possible ergonomic risk factors in the management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Methods: A search was carried out in the Google Academic/Scholar, PUBMED, SciELO Regional, SciELO Public Health, SciELO Cuba engines. In the search strategy, the terms were used: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, ergonomic risks, ergonomic risk perception in the working population. The documents were evaluated at length and a summary document of the information was developed.
Results: Dynamic and static postures, repetitive movements, load manipulation, psychological load and visual fatigue are considered risk factors that require greater attention in relation to the activities involved in the technique.
Conclusions: Possible ergonomic risk factors in the endoscopic procedure were described. The complex activities that derive from the procedure and their relationship with the specialties involved were considered, in order to promote occupational health, sustainability and the transition towards excellence in the services provided.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.